An innovative public transit design.... Or is it?

A Chinese public transit design was recently brought to my attention.  The "innovation" is that the bus is also a tunnel, such t...

Chinese tunnel bus
A Chinese public transit design was recently brought to my attention.  The "innovation" is that the bus is also a tunnel, such that cars can pass under it on roadways.  But I have some concerns.

Some of my concerns are structural.  Just how strong does the structure of the buss have to be to support its weight and the forces of its movement?  (Note: it's supposed to carry 1,200 passengers.) Especially with all those openings in the "legs" of the thing?  The bus appears to be more of a streetcar in that I see what appear to be rails and streetcar-like wheels (look at the inside of the right leg of the bus, at the bottom right side of the image).  What happens when the thing derails?  In case of derailment, how long will it take to clear the road, and what kind of traffic chaos might accrue in the interim?  And if, as the article suggests, the thing could run on conventional tires, what happens when it gets a flat, or if the road is in poor repair?  And the notion of it automatically following coloured lines painted on the road is pure vapourware; no intelligent vehicle has yet been constructed that can not be very easily fooled; and something as big as this bus is not something you want to fool into driving off the road.  It is also suggested that human drivers could be used.  Can you imagine the liability insurance?

How do passengers get on and off?  The doors look like they're at least two metres off the ground - this suggests special platforms and stations will be needed.  These platforms will need escalators and elevators in addition to steps.  They will take up presumably valuable real estate on sidewalks, and will be far more costly to build and maintain than the kind of bus stops one typically sees in cities today.

What about turning corners?  Given its size, it's not clear to me that it could navigate any curves but at custom-made intersections.  Does that mean we have to design the city and street system to accommodate the bus?  That sounds a little backwards to me.  How do cars manage if they're under this thing when it needs to turn?

The article I read explains that the bus is green because it uses electric power.  But that's one of great myths of sustainable transportation.  I mean, where does the electricity come from?  If it comes from a coal-fired power station - well, 'null said there. (Note: in 2007, it was reported that China uses coal for 69% of its primary energy, compared to 11% in Canada.)

Finally, if the end game is to displace cars for public transit (and I think it should be), then this does nothing to discourage car traffic - indeed, it makes it easier for cars to use the road.  And while we're on the subject, look at the cars on the road near and under the bus.  They look like exotic sports cars and SUVs to me.  Isn't that the wrong message to send?

In other words, I don't see any evidence here of any real system design; that is, this vehicle has to fit into a setting of some sort.  If it's going to do any good at all, it has to fit well.  Given even just the fairly obvious problems I've indicated here, I cannot see how this vehicle will fit well into an urban setting, except, possibly, in very limited and specially constructed situations.  At which point it really isn't "mass" transit anymore, and the cost of the system - especially it's maintenance - becomes ever more significant.

To be fair, I can see one alternative explanation here: bad reporting.  It may be that the person who wrote the piece just doesn't understand that extolling the benefits of a single machine or device is not enough to truly appreciate it's advantages.  It may in fact be that the vehicle's designers have dealt with all the problems I've indicated - any of which is enough to be a potential show-stopper - and that it just wasn't reported.  (And yes, I did check for other articles.  There's an article on that reads more like a Hollywood pitch for some new sci-fi movie: ultrasonics and laser signals and new driving regulations and special stoplights and so on. While there has clearly been some thought given to the problems of running this thing, the complexity it implies - and I would call it very complex - becomes in itself a stone around its own neck.)

So while I'm happy to admit that this is certainly an interesting and creative design, I'm not sure it's innovative.  Innovations, by definition, must be useful.  I'm just not convinced this vehicle would be useful.  And before I decide whether I'm for or against this thing, I'd want to know a lot more about how it's supposed to fit into its target environment.  And so should you.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online open design organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: An innovative public transit design.... Or is it?
An innovative public transit design.... Or is it?
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy