Yet another attempt to undermine science with rotten logic

[Originally posted 23 May 2011] I’ve written before about  the difference between science, the sciences, and scientists . These kind of diff...

[Originally posted 23 May 2011]
I’ve written before about the difference between science, the sciences, and scientists. These kind of differences are essential to make if you want your arguments make sense.  Confusing science and scientists is like confusing biology and a medical doctor – it’s stupid. Making these kinds of mistakes ends up letting one prove things like 1 = 2 and that the moon is made of blue cheese and that murder is perfectly acceptable.

Here’s an example.  In a recent post, Jerry Coyne quotes Jackson Lears as the latter tries – and fails miserably – to dissemble the work of Sam Harris.  Lears wrote: “To define science as the source of absolute truth, Harris must first ignore the messy realities of power in the world of Big Science.”
No, Mr. Lears, you are wrong.  Science is what it is, regardless of how poorly humans may undertake it.  Science is a process of iteratively improving one’s understanding of things by making observations, developing predictive theories that explain those observations, and then making more observations to either verify or falsify those theories.  Every single human on earth uses this basic approach to learn.  We use it to learn how to ride a bicycle, how to find the fastest route home from work, how to negotiate social situations, and how to play poker.  Even Jackson Lears uses science.
Science is what it is.
Scientists, on the other hand, are fallible human beings.  Scientists make mistakes.  But that’s not bad, because we only learn from our mistakes.  And that’s why replication of experiments is so fundamental to science: it weeds out the mistakes.  Science is, overall, self-correcting, because scientists, more than anyone else, know they make mistakes.
So here comes Jackson Lears, a professor of history for crying out loud, telling us that science cannot be trusted because scientists make mistakes.  Wow.  Does that mean penicillin is bad medicine because doctors can make mistakes?  Is mathematics wrong because a mathematician makes a mistake?  Of course not.  This kind of ridiculous reasoning is the type you expect from freshmen who party too much.
Jackson Lears is a fountain of childish prattle.  He is categorically, utterly, and totally wrong.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online open design organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: Yet another attempt to undermine science with rotten logic
Yet another attempt to undermine science with rotten logic
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy