A case of biomimetic design done right

Flaps? We don need no steekeeng flaps! Ars Technica published a story in October about a new test plane that flies without control surf...

flapless plane
Flaps? We don need no steekeeng flaps!
Ars Technica published a story in October about a new test plane that flies without control surfaces.  The trick is that by directing jets of air over the trailing edge of the wing, one can effectively fake the existence of real flaps, elevators, and ailerons.  Using so-called "fluidic control" makes for less complex systems (mechanically, at least) which in turn make for lighter, more maneuverable, less costly, and longer lasting aircraft.

I don't know if the engineers who developed this design actively pursued biomimetic design, but I think this is a great example of biomimetic design done right.

While I can't be sure, it seems a reasonable inference that, originally, aircraft control surfaces - flaps, ailerons, elevators, and rudder - were designed to mimic a bird's wing.  (That was certainly Leonardo's thinking.)  A bird can change the shape of the airfoil it's wings assume to change its aerodynamic characteristics and thus control its flight.  Each type of control surface on a plane changes the shape of the wing to achieve a specific kind of control.  That is, aircraft mimic the structure of birds.

However - and this is a problem I've always had with biomimetics - mimicking structure is rarely the right thing to do.  Indeed, the best examples of biomimicry in design usually start with a naturally occurring structure, but then re-design it using the full power of all our knowledge and available technology. Consider velcro, which was first conceived of by George de Mestral while considering how burrs "fastened" onto his pet dog's fur.  Actual velcro is significantly different in structure from either burr or fur, but it is functionally equivalent.

What I see in this new aircraft design is an attempt to see past the structure of birds to the actual function, and then to look for alternative means to achieve those functions that poor Mother Nature lacked when she was busy evolving the flight of birds.  This is what I think real biomimicry is about.  I think this because Nature is very much constrained in ways that we are not.  It may well be that in some cases, we cannot find a better structural solution than what Nature has evolved.  However, we should never just accept Nature's solution as the best; we should only use it as a starting point.  As in the case of fluidic control, if we can lower cost and weight, and improve reliability and performance - well, then I think it would be foolish to stick with what Nature came up with.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online open design organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: A case of biomimetic design done right
A case of biomimetic design done right
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy