Greenpeace, Ontario nurses show sad ignorance of nuclear facts

We need to pursue nuclear energy. Today, an "urgent appeal" was issued by Greenpeace and the collective of Ontario nurses to ...

Nuclear energy should be in our future.
We need to pursue nuclear energy.
Today, an "urgent appeal" was issued by Greenpeace and the collective of Ontario nurses to the provincial government, to defer discussions meant to result in the construction of new nuclear power stations in Ontario.

What sad, ignorant fools they are.  Nuclear energy - though not a definitive long term solution - is an excellent intermediate measure that can be used very safely while we find better, more usable energy sources - and learn to stop being such energy hogs.

I have a great deal of respect for nurses generally, but I'm disappointed by their position on this matter. They're nurses, not nuclear scientists.  They haven't the expertise needed to contribute meaningfully on nuclear energy.

Greenpeace, on the other hand, I have no respect for at all.  They give those of us who really care about sustainability a bad name.  They're political, not environmental, activists.  I think they're motivated more by anarchist tendencies than by any particularly sanguine or informed desire to "save the planet."

Recent events at the nuclear facility in Fukushima have given sundry Machiavellian groups, like Greenpeace, fodder to come at nuclear energy again.  Greenpeace is well known for this kind of lame tactic.  The Ontario nurses are new players in this, apparently.  Too bad they're on the wrong side.

The argument they pose is that, based on the dangerous situation in Japan, we need to stop building nuclear power stations in Ontario.  They talk about significant risks, environmental harm, human error, and such.  But as all those who have a hidden agenda, their arguments are deeply flawed.

Here are some facts that are important because they undermine their arguments completely.

The earthquake in Japan measured 9 on the Richter Scale.  What most people don't know about the Richter Scale is that it's non-linear.  That is, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake is 10 times stronger than a magnitude 8.0 Earthquake.  The strongest earthquake ever measured in Ontario measured 6.1, in 1935.  That's just about 800 times weaker than the Japan earthquake.  According to the US Geological Survey, "several million earthquakes occur in the world each year."  And Ontario is definitely not known for its earthquakes.  The point is this: the odds of an earthquake occurring in Ontario that is powerful enough to significantly damage one of our nuclear reactors is infinitesimal.  So whoever thinks that Ontario reactors will meet an end similar to those in Fukushima are wrong, and whoever advocates for this position is a liar.

The risk of death associated with nuclear accidents is absurdly small.  Consider the information here. These are indisputable facts, mind you, not the rants of self-absorbed do-gooders.  Nuclear energy is as safe as anything else.  And if you're looking to address causes of premature death, virtually every other possible source exceeds that of death by nuclear accident.

Another flaw in the arguments against nuclear power in Ontario has to do with the reactors themselves. While the Fukushima BWR (boiling water reactor) design is quite respectable, the CANDU design is better; indeed, it was designed expressly to fail safely, as they say.  So again, the shrill cries of the anti-nuclear advocates are just plain wrong - they're comparing apples and oranges.  It's like saying a Ford Pinto is the same as a Lamborghini Diablo because they're both cars.

Sure, there is "nuclear waste" produced by reactors.  But it doesn't have to be waste.  The Yucca Mountain storage facility, which likely won't be built now, was intended to store American nuclear waste.  While one might argue the wisdom of putting that much nuclear waste in one place, it does form a huge heat source, heat that can be used to generate massive amounts of electricity, and that would last for several thousands of years.  That would be a tremendous way to generate "clean" energy.

Furthermore, there are kinds of reactors that can be used to generate even more power from already-spent nuclear fuel, and as a by-product, produce much-needed radioactive isotopes for medical purposes.  I already wrote about this.

So the complaints of the anti-nuclear movement are again unfounded insofar as the technology involved is concerned.

In the end, the real problem isn't nuclear energy or the technologies needed to generate it.  The real problem is a "people problem," one of ignorance and self-serving political agendas, of people too worried about the incomprehensibly remote accidents and not worried enough about the far more massive and serious problems facing the world today: starvation, terrorism, genocide, rampant petroleum consumption, irrecoverable waste, and - at the root of it all - the pathetic ignorance of a few loud-mouths who have nothing better to do than cause trouble.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: Greenpeace, Ontario nurses show sad ignorance of nuclear facts
Greenpeace, Ontario nurses show sad ignorance of nuclear facts
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy