A.C. Grayling's wonderful new book on humanism

I recently had the pleasure of reading A.C. Grayling's latest book, The God Argument: The Case Against Religion and for Humanism .  Gray...

I recently had the pleasure of reading A.C. Grayling's latest book, The God Argument: The Case Against Religion and for Humanism.  Grayling is a wonderful writer, creating prose that is rich with content while also being very easy to read.

His thesis is that religion is an unnecessary evil in modern society because all its good features and none of its bad features are readily available in humanism.  He argues his case by dividing his book into two major sections: the first - the "case against religion" - is a summary of all the major problems suffered by theism; the second - the "case for humanism" - is a detailed philosophical exposition of how elements of humanism can be swapped in to one's personal philosophy as each unjustifiable element of religion is swapped out.

Some have suggested that there is nothing particularly new in the book - that the arguments have pretty much all been around for a fairly long time (millennia in some cases).  I think such opinions are only superficially correct in that Grayling stitches the arguments together into a sensible whole far better than anyone else has to date.  And the whole, in this case, is certainly more than just the collection of parts. Indeed, I think it's the best such synthesis I've ever read.

Others have suggested that this book is more a political argument for social liberalism than a philosophical argument for post-religious spirituality, whatever that means (sounds like post-modernist crap to me).  Considering that the political right seems to lean more towards conventional/traditional religious views, remarks like that aren't surprising.  But I also think any connection to political arguments are derivative of the philosophy and not the other way round.  There is no question of Grayling's intent: he is keenly interested in finding ways of promoting general well-being, happiness, fulfilment, and meaning in everyone's own lives.  Whether than makes him a "social liberal" or not is irrelevant, quite frankly, as it strikes me that a world full of happy, healthy, fulfilled individuals is clearly more important than having one where social liberalism (or whatever other political stance) is seen as superior.

All this notwithstanding, I remained slightly frustrated by The God Argument because Grayling seemed to steer clear of even proposing some arguments that I think don't get enough "air play."  Many of these arguments are scientific in nature.  Grayling can of course be excused for not covering these because he is not a scientist, and he was clearly writing from his own expertise.  I certainly appreciate his obvious desire to keep his writing grounded in that of which he is himself a world-class expert, but it doesn't allay my frustrations.  I mention it only to provide some warning to other science wonks who may choose to read The God Argument that they too may feel as I do.

There are two arguments, however, that support humanism and undermine religion, that I would have thought Grayling might have tried to address.  One is an inductive argument based on history.  Religion came first, then philosophy, then science.  Fundamentally, all three are attempts to understand the universe.  The boundaries between the three disciplines are not especially crisp, particularly if one considers their historical development.  It seems to me, then, that it's more a matter of evolution - of continual refinement of thinking and reasoning - that has led us to where we are today.  There is no question that Grayling's philosophical arguments assume some truth to science - that the earth orbits the sun, for instance; or more generally that evidence-based reasoning is superior to other forms of reasoning.  In this view, religion is just an old idea whose time has passed.

The other argument is based on evidence that exists in the world today, that religion is negatively correlated with most (if not all) reasonable measures of "successful societies."  While not strictly philosophical in nature, it does fall under the rubric of the kind of applied philosophy that Grayling argues is important for human progress.

In any case, I would advise anyone with an interest in humanity's continued progress to read Grayling's book.  It's bound to make you think.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: A.C. Grayling's wonderful new book on humanism
A.C. Grayling's wonderful new book on humanism
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy