No, academia does not resemble a drug gang

There's a blog post by Alexandre Afonso (London School of Economics and Political Science) that proposes the rather odd notion that aca...

There's a blog post by Alexandre Afonso (London School of Economics and Political Science) that proposes the rather odd notion that academia is a like a drug gang. The argument is based on a narrow and incomplete perspective of what drives academics that seems rooted in a simplistic worldview where everything is related only via economics and politics.  It's a case of the blind men and the elephant.

Do these gentlemen look like your colleagues?
UPDATE: Afonso responded to this post here. My rebuttal is post as a comment on his blog rather than here (he seems to care more about getting clicks than I do); a direct link to my comment is here.

The abstract of the post provides an accurate overview of the rest of the article: "Academic systems rely on the existence of a supply of 'outsiders' ready to forgo wages and employment security in exchange for the prospect of uncertain security, prestige, freedom and reasonably high salaries that tenured positions entail. Drawing on data from the US, Germany and the UK, Alexandre Afonso looks at how the academic job market is structured in many respects like a drug gang, with an expanding mass of outsiders and a shrinking core of insiders."

Well!  That's not why I'm an academic, and indeed, I'm having a very hard time thinking of more than a handful of my colleagues who are well-described by Afonso's characterization.  I became an academic because (a) I love the work and (b) it keeps me away from the pedantry and small-mindedness so prevalent in "the real world."  I surely don't do it for money, although our combined income allows my wife and I to not be particularly worried about our finances.  The very first sentence of Afonso's article is at best a bald assertion and at worst a complete mischaracterization, in some parts of the world at least.  The second sentence suggests a correlation (which is elucidated in the rest of the article) - but as we (should) know, correlation does not imply causation.

The next few paragraphs of Afonso's article give a brief overview of drug gangs.  Again, he takes a purely economic route, explaining the motivation of low-level drug gang members to work for ridiculously low earnings solely on the premise that they are betting on becoming wealthy drug lords in the long run.

I am not convinced. One can easily use google scholar to find a great deal of research literature on drug gangs.  It is apparent that there are many psychological, sociological, and cultural factors that attract people to that kind of life.  To just write it all off as "explained" with economics alone is facile and superficial; it's like a blind man feeling the trunk of an elephant and thinking it a snake.

Then Afonso starts describing the situation in academia.  He presents accurate data for a staggering increase in the number of PhD graduates in OECD countries over the first decade of the 21st century, without mentioning at all the actual proportions or the sometimes significant background.  For instance, Slovakia increased its number of PhD graduates by a factor of nearly 4, to 2.2% of the "reference age cohort." Sounds huge, right?  Well, since Slovakia's population is about 5 1/2 million, Slovakia produces only about 1% of the number of PhD graduates that the US does, even accounting for the differences in graduation rates.  Suddenly not so huge any more.  None of this very relevant comparison is made by Afonso.

Afonso also completely overlooks the impact of the Bologna Process, which is an initiative intended to harmonize the various university systems scattered across the EU, the implementation of which has been ongoing since 1999.  The Bologna Process has removed many of the barriers that had been erected over the decades that prevented students from studying anywhere in the EU and have meaningful credentials in their home country at the end of it.

Finally, Afonso ignores the effects of other events - even economic ones - that occurred in the first decade of the 21st century - like, say, the global economic crisis.  Portugal and Greece, two other countries singled out by Afonso for their substantive increases, also happen to have been two countries hardest hit by the crisis.  Other countries that were hit hard by the crisis (e.g. UK, Denmark) also exceeded the OECD average on PhD outputs.  Doesn't this effect bear closer scrutiny?  Of course it does.  Afonso just blew it.

This mortally flawed analysis leads Afonso to the sensationalistic conclusion: "So what you have is an increasing number of PhD graduates arriving every year into the market hoping to secure a permanent position as a professor and enjoying freedom and – reasonably – high salaries, a bit like the rank-and-file drug dealer  hoping to become a drug lord."  Fortunately, his conclusion can be dismissed summarily because his analysis is so incomplete.

Afonso then decides to try to drill down into more detail.  He starts with "The developments outlined above are broad dynamics that span across almost all advanced industrial countries."  This claim is patently false because everything he wrote to that point is horribly flawed.  Furthermore, the characterization that he has captured "broad dynamics" is laughable: he only considered economic explanations, rather than cultural, psychological, social, and technological factors, and he didn't touch the dynamics (how these influences change over time) at all.

His analysis of the situation of academia in the US completely ignores the anti-science and anti-education lobbies there, which are substantial, nor does he consider the effect on academia of the billions of dollars that America spends on defence - more than any other country in the world.  His analysis of Germany completely ignores that country's tumultuous recent history, including reunification and becoming probably the most important country in the EU.  His analysis of the UK ignores the impact of the development and growth of the EU on UK, which has been staggering.

So, no, academia does not resemble a drug gang.  Basically, Afonso's article is a useless pile of half-truths and sensationalistic clickbait.  Not what one should expect from the London School of Economics.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online open design organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: No, academia does not resemble a drug gang
No, academia does not resemble a drug gang
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy