This is not a door. This is a sad joke.

How horrible is this design? Let me count the ways! I keep seeing this horrible thing all over social media, and I have absolutely had i...

How horrible is this design? Let me count the ways!
How horrible is this design? Let me count the ways!
I keep seeing this horrible thing all over social media, and I have absolutely had it with people having intellectual orgasms over it.

An Austrian artist, Klemes Torggler, designed this brain fart.  It got picked up by a few design websites and then went viral.  Fortunately, that all passed months ago, except lately I've started noticing this thing appearing again, all over the place.  And in virtually every case, the "reviews" are just ridiculously over the top.  You'd think Torggler had just cured cancer or invented FTL.

I am compelled, therefore, to write this and clearly state just how horrible a design this really is.

You can see another image of this thing here, in a different colour and with more detail showing.  In good lighting and with better contrast, it's easy to see that it's no where near as rigid as the viral animated GIF suggests.  Also, the mechanisms that let it work are much more evident.  Kind of takes the magic away when the hinges are so obvious, eh?

Here's a list of the things that are wrong with this joke of a "door."  It's probably not exhaustive, but it should be enough to clearly show why this design is just a terrible joke.
  1. Say your hands are full. How do you get it to open?
  2. It can close by accident if you brush against it when coming through the doorway (towards the camera). Even if it doesn't close completely, it will likely close enough that no one can pass through it behind you.
  3. Soundproofing? Ve don neeed no steekeeng soundproofing!
  4. Lots of opportunity for it to pinch your fingers.
  5. The centre, which juts out as the door opens/closes, is just about at the perfect height to poke your young child's eye out, bash them in the ears, or knock them on the back of their heads.
  6. It provides absolutely no security.
  7. Bleeds air like a sieve.
  8. Consumes wallspace unnecessarily.
  9. Really high stresses in the fixed pivot points, especially in fatigue, which means it'll wear out much faster than a regular door.
  10. If you look closely, you can see it vibrate when it opens and closes, likely indicating it will start squeaking and groaning quite soon after installation.
  11. The vibration will make it hit the wall behind it, likely staining it over time. Won't that look attractive?
  12. What happens when you "slam" it?
  13. In older buildings, doorways are unique and not even necessarily square. This implies custom manufacturing, which means even higher price.
So if you could stop fawning over this absurd, pointless, and dangerous exercise in egomania by the "artist" inventor, that'd be great. Thanks.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online open design organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: This is not a door. This is a sad joke.
This is not a door. This is a sad joke.
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy