Function, behaviour, and evolution

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="300"] Yeast was used to show that evolutionary fitness can be predict...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="300"] Yeast was used to show that evolutionary fitness can be predictable.[/caption]

Some new research suggests that evolutionary fitness is predictable even if the route taken is not. This actually bears on the difference between function and behaviour, both in nature and in designed products.

Dr. Michael Desai at Harvard has done some very impressive work with the evolution of yeast. He has shown that the fitness of different lines of yeast is essentially the same. This means that even though the mutations that result in different strains are random, they all tend - after a sufficient number of generations - to result in populations that are equally fit. All evolutionary roads lead, as it were, to Rome.

I think this work is a very good demonstration of the difference between behaviour and function.

I've always thought of behaviour as the direct response or output of a system to direct stimuli or inputs. Exert a physical force on an object, and it will deform; shine a light on something, and it reflects some and absorbs the rest; add enough heat to something and it will change state (or even combust).

Function, on the other hand, is the role that behaviour plays in a larger system.  Deformation (and resistance to it) of objects means the object will contain energy; reflected light will make an object visible to some agent; combusting something will generate heat and energy that some agent can use.

There are many behaviours that can provide the same function. The behaviours of a teacher, a textbook, and a responsive website are all very different, but they all provide the same function - to "teach."  Planes, trains, and automobiles all behave in different ways, but provide the same function of moving people and cargo.  Photovoltaics, nuclear power plants, and Lithium batteries all have different behaviours, but they all have the same function - to make electric power available.

I think Desai's work shows the difference between behaviour and function in nature.  The fitness of his yeast strains are an indicator that the strains have all reached some stable functional niche within their environment.  The specifics of each strain, as described by the mutations that give rise to them, imply some behavioural difference in the biochemistry they carry out.

I find this pleasing, as a design researcher, because it suggests that there is a certain naturalness to the behaviour/function dichotomy.  That is, if there is a symmetry between how we model natural systems and artificial systems, it means we potentially have a universal framework for understanding reality.

That bodes well for systems thinking (of which the behaviour/function framework is part) as a universally applicable way of understanding the universe.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: Function, behaviour, and evolution
Function, behaviour, and evolution
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy