The trouble with marketing

Influencing choice can be bad. I came across an old link I'd squirrelled  away about research on consumers' mindsets.  I found t...

Influencing choice can be bad.
I came across an old link I'd squirrelled  away about research on consumers' mindsets.  I found the way the research was written up for public consumption to demonstrate quite crisply the ethical difference between design and marketing.

In a blurb in MITSloan Management Review from October 2010, we have a research summary by Kelly Goldsmith, Jing Xu and Ravi Dhar, called The Power of Customers’ Mindset.  It reports on research suggesting that there are two different consumer mindsets that result on different approaches to deciding what to buy.  Some people have an abstract mindset; these are people who will tend to notice similarities between various products based on abstract characteristics and attributes. And then there are people with a concrete mindset; these are people who will tend to notice differences in particular characteristics and attributes of different products.

So far, so good. This doesn't surprise me at all.  It's rather like so many other dichotomies that researchers seem to find in people.

But then we have this: "In other words, if you get a consumer thinking a certain way, that way of thinking — that mindset — can influence his or her subsequent shopping behavior."  And the research then goes on to suggest that " abstract mindset increases the number of products consumers select."

It seems quite clear, then, that the point of the research is to help marketers influence people's minds.  To make them want things.  Of course, the marketers are in a pretty serious conflict of interest: they benefit directly from ensuring their campaigns are successful, whether or not people actually want or need the products they market.

This research is also useful for designers, but in an antithetical sense to that implied by the report from the Sloan Review.  In design, we do not (necessarily) seek to change the minds of people.  We seek to understand them and help them achieve their goals.  If we can unequivocally demonstrate that their goals are harmful, then a designer should make every attempt to exert influence, but only by using evidence-based, sound reasoning.

Whereas the designer seeks to help people fulfil their goals through design, the marketer seeks to manipulate people's goals to the benefit of their client, whose ethics are rarely if ever verified by the marketer before a contract is signed.

I should note that the Sloan Review blurb mentions a working paper covering the actual research done in greater detail.  I cannot find any evidence of that working paper.  I did find mention, however, in the vita of the lead author (available at her home institution's website), of a working paper on the same general topic and by the same three authors.  The paper itself, though, eludes me entirely.



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online open design organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: The trouble with marketing
The trouble with marketing
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy