Who wants to be a philosopher?

It's so cute when the philosophers struggle to answer a question that's been answered repeatedly outside the bounds of their discipl...

It's so cute when the philosophers struggle to answer a question that's been answered repeatedly outside the bounds of their discipline. They're so self-limiting and coyly arrogant when they do that.

Source: FunnyTimes.
Over at Debunking Christianity, John Loftus reviews some philosophical shenanigans around deciding who should and who should not be labeled a “philosopher." And they have a grand ol' time, gazing at their own navels, at each others navels, at the concept of navelness....

Hey! Over here, guys! It's us, the Professions! We've been doing that shit forever.

Yes, it's true. It's not a trivial exercise, but there is a well-understood process for developing exactly the kind of structure the philosophers apparently wish they had. Doctors, lawyers, engineers, nurses, and social workers are just some of the fields that have professional certification. And though the specific requirements may vary, the overall process is the same.

And the process is the same in all the professions because it works, and because no one has ever found a better alternative.  Generally, it runs like this:

  • You get proper training (through a separately certified educational program).
  • You intern to gain practical experience.
  • You pass special licensing exams (always covering but not only limited to the ethics of practice).
  • Congratulations, you have permission to call yourself a XYZ.

The reason for professional certification is to lessen the chances that a practitioner will cause harm or worse in the course of practicing their discipline. The training and interning demonstrates you have the necessary skills, and the licensing exams demonstrate you know how to practice responsibly. So once you're practicing and you fuck up, it must have been only either a true accident or entirely your fault. If it's your fault, a system of progressive disciplary actions are taken, based on how badly you fucked up. And all this is in parallel with and disjoint from criminal and civil court proceedings that might result from a fuck up.

And finally, you revisit the entire system every five to ten years, to check for bugs, problems, inefficiencies, and other imperfections.

How simple is that?

In the Loftus piece, Hector Avalos comes closest to independently discovering professional certification, but then they lose the thread again by going totally circular: "The words for "philosopher" and "scholar" must have meaning, so philosophers and biblical scholars working in those fields are best qualified to define them.”  Yeah, but the whole point of certification is to determine who is "best qualified.” Duh!

What’s worse, the given “experts” in a field aren’t necessarily the best qualified to define such terms, because they won't be able to see the forest for the trees. They need to be transparent an involve a small group of professionals, who understand how and why we certify experts, and who can help lead the philosophers out of the dense underbrush of their own discipline and into the light of the broader body of knowledge.

I doubt they'll do it any time soon,  though.  They're too used to their navel-gazing - much like the deformed feet of Chinese women of old - and cannot unbend their necks to raise their eyes.

To be honest, the same phenomenon exists in my own field of design. While there are certain fields like graphic design and industrial design that have some measure of licensing, engineering is the only true profession in the lot.  But there’s no overarching certification process for “design” writ large.  And every time someone tries to suggest it, they’re struck down using largely the same kind of arguments that Loftus’s post hints at in philosophy.

Fundamentally, though, it’s quite simple.  You go to a certified Xer (philosopher, designer, whatever-er) because certification implies significantly more robust and reliable results.

And considering all the crap philosophy out there (and crap design too), I think both disciplines could do with more certification.

COMMENTS

Name

academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
false
ltr
item
The Trouble with Normal...: Who wants to be a philosopher?
Who wants to be a philosopher?
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EkYFkMFRLtE/Vdi447_4gxI/AAAAAAAAXMo/s7XBsJPBJ2o/s320/FunnyPhilosophy.jpg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EkYFkMFRLtE/Vdi447_4gxI/AAAAAAAAXMo/s7XBsJPBJ2o/s72-c/FunnyPhilosophy.jpg
The Trouble with Normal...
http://filsalustri.blogspot.com/2015/08/who-wants-to-be-philosopher.html
http://filsalustri.blogspot.com/
http://filsalustri.blogspot.com/
http://filsalustri.blogspot.com/2015/08/who-wants-to-be-philosopher.html
true
389378225362699292
UTF-8
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy