The laughable hypocrisy of Harper's science "policies"

Harper is a pox on science in Canada. (Source: McLeans ) I was recently reminded of the Canadian Government's  Open Access Policy on...

Harper is a pox on science in Canada. (Source: McLeans)
I was recently reminded of the Canadian Government's Open Access Policy on Publications.  This policy is supposed to help ensure that Canadian scientists are encouraged - indeed, required! - to make their published work "freely accessible within 12 months of publication."
On the face of it, this seems perfectly normal and laudable.  The 12 month delay is intended to give publishers their chance to rip their pound of flesh from various institutions in the form of subscription fees, etc.  (That's a whole other problem.)  Thereafter, work paid for by the Feds needs to be available to everyone. The policy even allows the expense of publishing in Open Access journals to be recouped from research grants.
Easy, right?
Except that what the Harper fascists give with one hand, they take back with the other. That is to say, it's one thing to publish your research, but Harper and his totalitarian cronies are literally preventing important research from being done*.  You can't publish research you can't carry out. And if der F├╝hrer Harper controls what does get published, then all this becomes is a propaganda machine for his reactionary, fear-mongering policies.
This is really a new high for Conservative hypocrisy, and a new low for scholarly research in Canada.

I was going to end this post here, but I must take a moment to comment on one especially pernicious ass-wipe, Andrew Leach, who wrote a staggeringly misleading article for Maclean's in 2014.  In it, he writes:
"To speak out publicly against government policy is, by the current definition, fundamentally at odds with the role of a public servant in our democracy. Public servants are expected to provide impartial advice to the policy development process and loyal implementation of government policies once decisions are taken. They are not supposed to critique that policy publicly when it doesn’t align with their interpretation of the evidence or their beliefs with respect to how that evidence should be weighed. Allowing public servants to be openly critical of government decisions – whether based on scientific evidence or any other criteria – turns the relationship between the bureaucracy and their democratically elected masters on its head, undermining the trust essential to an effective working relationship."
A public servant's first professional ethical responsibility is to the public he or she serves, not to the political class and its bureaucracy. "Loyal implementation"? Why? If a decision is taken that is not in the public's best interest, then it is absolutely obligatory that public servants speak out as vigorously as possible.  That's because our loyalty (yes, I'm a public servant) is to the public, not to the government.  This kind of right-wing false rhetoric is what we should expect from the American Republicants, not from our own, presumably more measured "leaders." Leach then tries to subvert the whole scientific process by writing about "interpretation of evidence or their beliefs."  We're not talking about interpretation and belief here.  We're talking about scientific publications - we're talking about the actual evidence itself!  He wraps up that paragraph with a startling bit of sophistry that, the more one read it, turns ever more into the word salad it actually is.  Where does the bureaucracy come into it?  How does saying that Canada's climate change record, for instance, is abysmal relate at all to the bureaucracy?  And what trust is he actually talking about? The trust between bureaucrats and politicians? Between the people and the bureaucracy?  Or the government?  Trust is based on the ability to predict behaviour.  How does a scientific statement of fact alter that?

Let's be clear, Harper has destroyed data, shut down research centres and programs, and utterly disregarded the urging of experts to act on a number of issues.  As far as science is concerned, there's little separating today's Canada from cold-war USSR.

* Here's just a few references:



academia activism adaptation admin aesthetics affect ageing AI analogy android anthropology anticipation app architecture art arts Asia assistive technology automobile balance biology biomimetics book branding building built environment business CAD Canada care case cfp change revision children codesign cognition collaboration colonization commercialization commonplacing communication design competition complexity computation computer science computing concept map conference constructivism conversational analysis craft creative arts creativity CSCW culture cybernetics degrowth dementia design design thinking digital digital media digital reproduction digital scholarship disability dissertation drawing economics education effectiveness efficiency emotion engineering environment ergonomics ethics ethnography Evernote evolution exhibition exoskeleton experience experimental studies fail fashion featured film food function modeling futurism gender studies Germany globalization grantsmanship graphic design Greece HCI health heritage history housing human factors humanism identity image inclusivity industrial design informatics information innovation interaction interdisciplinarity interior design internet of things intervention iphone journal journalism language law library life life cycle lifehack literature review logistics luxury making management manufacturing material culture materials mechanics media method migration mobile motion design movie nature new product development Nexus 6 olfaction online open design organization packaging paper participatory design PBL pengate performance PhD philosophy planning policy politics practice predatory preservation prison proceedings productivity project management public space publishing reading Remember The Milk reproduction research resource-limited design reuse review Samsung scholarship science science fiction semiotics senses service design simplicity society sociology software space strategic design student sustainability systems tactile tangibility technology textile theatre theory Toodledo Toronto tourism traffic transhumanism transnationalism transportation tv uncertainty universal design urban usa usability user experience visualization wearable well-being women workshop writing
The Trouble with Normal...: The laughable hypocrisy of Harper's science "policies"
The laughable hypocrisy of Harper's science "policies"
The Trouble with Normal...
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy